DISCLAIMER

Dear reader(s)

All the stories posted here are author's personal view and does not reflect anybody's or represent any institutions or organization to which the author is associated unless otherwise mentioned or referred or sources cited after the article. Therefore, any errors are also of the author. Any post which may be directly or indirectly related to any institutions where blogger may be affiliated does not in anyway represent these institutions. Readers may use the information for any educational or research purpose at their own risks on accuracy and authenticity of the information provided herein. The photo(s) from the author's private collection may not be reproduced in any form, electronic or otherwise without prior permission.

The information given here are updated and authenticated to the extent possible and to the best of the knowledge of the blogger and not otherwise.

Anyone wishing to use all or part of the posts published on this blog may kindly obtain permission from the author by emailing at sonamphuentsho111@gmail.com.

NOTE: The blogger is not responsible for any damages caused for whatever reason by using the information posted on this blog unless provided to the user with written permission from the Author.


Thursday 30 July 2009

Constitution: Most commonly used point to defend their arguments, the parlaiment members

The third session of the parliament of Bhutan after becoming the democratic has almost come to an end. Numerous resolutions including the passing of bills took place so far. It ranged from state funding of political parties to contituency development funds, national assembly act to nationsl civil service act 2009 to entilements of constitutional post holders to police bill to local government acts. In all these cases, when ever either of the houses confronted with problems or amendments, it was always backed by the cluases of Constitution of Kingdom of Bhutan.

No matter, whether it is true or not, applicable or not, every parliament member who stood up to speak quoted articles or sections of the constitution to defend his or her point.

When the Cabinet Ministers did not turn up for the question session at the National Council, the council members qouting the articles and sections of the consitution to say that it is mentioned in the constitution. Therefore, the cabinet ministers have violated the constitution by not coming for the question session.

At the same time, including the Prime Minister, Lyonchen JYT defended that it is not necessary for the ministers to be present for the question as per some articles of the constitution.

Even in the past, the National Council Members and the opposition party rejected the Constituency Development Grant on the pretext that it is unconstitutional.

The Thromde Act, Dzongkhag Yargay Tshogdue and Gewog Yargay Tshogchung Chhathrim went an extensive review and amendent because it contravenes many artciles of the constitution.

Thus, in conclusion, the use of articles and sections of the constitution is used bit more excessive at times even for a small and minor changes and rectifications.

No comments:

Post a Comment

My Blog

My Blog

Search This Blog